Halfway through the course, students and lecturers in the class must give each other feedback – how are the classes actually going? Is there something that can be improved?

The mid-term follow-up is an oral dialogue in the class, but it is recommended that you write down keywords here in Absalon for use in the final evaluation.

Before the class, you are encouraged to reflect on the following questions:

How would you rate your own efforts in the classroom and between lessons?
Can you do something to improve the teaching process?
How would you rate the teacher's efforts, i.e. What works well and what works less well?
What can be done to improve the teaching?

The purpose of the interim evaluation is to:

Take stock of which of the competences of the goal description the students have achieved.
Give mutual feedback on how the teaching works and agree on any adjustments that can ensure a satisfactory course of teaching and a fulfilment of the course's objectives description.

You must allocate approx. 15 minutes of the lesson to debate the questions. In the teaching on courses that run for a short period of time (up to 1 1/2 months), you can agree on that the mid-point evaluation will take place on an ongoing basis if there are any questions or comments about the teaching or go directly to the final evaluation.